Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is much better than Moto G7 Power, getting a 79.9 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a newer phone, and it is also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
Motorola Moto G7 Power has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G7 Power and Galaxy A25 5G both feature similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.