Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is slightly better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 global score. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an older 14 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Moto G7 Power, but it is also a bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a better pixel number per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor, a much more megapixels camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Galaxy A35 5G has slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Moto G7 Power.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.