Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a general score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. The Galaxy A5 (2017) is an extremely older phone than the Moto G7 Power, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a more vivid display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit better performance than Moto G7 Power. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G7 Power features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto G7 Power also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G7 Power takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a much less MP back facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The Motorola Moto G7 Power features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.