Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Galaxy A50's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than Moto G7 Power, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a brighter display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a greater number of pixels per screen inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has more internal memory.
The Galaxy A50 captures clearer photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a way more MP back camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot more expensive than Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.