Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 general score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Moto G7 Power.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater pixels density and a way better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G7 Power counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G7 Power, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.