Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's overall score of 72.6. The Galaxy A52 is a much newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a sharper display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a better display density, a little larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots way better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a much bigger sensor and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power has just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.