Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than Moto G7 Power, with a 91.3 score against 72.6. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is noticeably newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G7 Power. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a more vivid display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a better display pixel density and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G7 Power has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.