Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a lot better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 general score. Galaxy A52s is a way newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a brighter screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a greater pixel number per screen inch, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Moto G7 Power counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.