Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, with a 75.8 score against 72.6. Galaxy A6's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G7 Power, although both were only released 9 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy A6 and Motorola Moto G7 Power both have very similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A6 has a little bit lower resolution of 720 x 1480px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a little bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G7 Power also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G7 Power features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G7 Power features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A6 has a camera that is very similar to the camera in Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although the Galaxy A6 has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A6 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.