Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Power, with a 76.9 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than Moto G7 Power, even when both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy A70 has a little better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A70 features a little sharper screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen.
Moto G7 Power counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 96 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, else you can save some money and buy the Moto G7 Power, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.