Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is way better than Moto G7 Power, with a score of 87.5 against 72.6. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy A71 construction is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Moto G7 Power.
Galaxy A71 has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A71 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger camera aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A71 costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.