Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer device, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each display inch, a quite bigger screen and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better memory for games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G7 Power features just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7 Power, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.