Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G7 Power, with a score of 97.6 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly heavier but incredibly thinner than the Moto G7 Power, and both were released with only 8 months difference. These phones use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Galaxy Fold has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a better screen pixel density, a much better 1536 x 2152 resolution and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures clearer videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has better video frame rate, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a way bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G7 Power has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.