Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is way better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, having a 90.8 score against 72.6. Galaxy Note 20 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. The Galaxy Note 20 has a much better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a better display density, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better processing power than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 takes better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs, a way higher video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G7 Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G7 Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.