Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Moto G7 Power, getting a global score of 98.9 against 72.6. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Moto G7 Power, although it is also just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a sharper display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a way higher pixels quantity per display inch and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot better resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G7 Power counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G7 Power, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.