Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a general score of 80.4, which is better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 overall score. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than the Moto G7 Power, it's design is thinner and lighter. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition takes a little bit better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Moto G7 Power counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7 Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G7 Power, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.