Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, having an 89 score against 72.6. Although Galaxy Note10 and Motorola Moto G7 Power were released only 7 months apart, Galaxy Note10 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280, a better count of pixels per display inch and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 takes a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality, a much bigger aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7 Power, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.