Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's global score of 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note10 Lite body is newer and a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola Moto G7 Power.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little faster CPU than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments, a larger back-facing camera sensor and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Moto G7 Power has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.