Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than Moto G7 Power, having a 79.5 score against 72.6. Galaxy Note7 is an incredibly older phone than Moto G7 Power, but Samsung managed to build it somewhat lighter and thinner. The Galaxy Note7 has a much better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Note7 has a processor that is very similar to the Moto G7 Power one, because although the Galaxy Note7 has less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note7 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy Note7 also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger sensor. Moto G7 Power counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.