Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is way better than the Moto G7 Power, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 72.6. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S10 is a thinner and notably lighter phone than the Moto G7 Power, although both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 counts with a lot better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a way better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs, better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way bigger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Galaxy S10 is way more expensive than Moto G7 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.