Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, with a global score of 93.6 against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body weights the same than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but it's somewhat thinner. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a lot better display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S10 5G also has higher video frame rates, a way larger aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Moto G7 Power has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.