Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting a global score of 90.8 against 72.6. Galaxy S20 FE's design is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G7 Power. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has much more memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM memory. Moto G7 Power counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has an 11% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.