Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer and just a bit thinner than Moto G7 Power's, but it's also heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a lot better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto G7 Power, because it has a bigger aperture, a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Motorola Moto G7 Power.
Although Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto G7 Power, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.