Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 has a general score of 93.4, which is much better than Moto G7 Power's score of 72.6. Galaxy S22 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G7 Power. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the older 13 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S22 counts with a lot better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot better pixels number per inch in the display. The Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S22 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Moto G7 Power counts with improved battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.