Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Moto G7 Power, having a 95.4 score against 72.6. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is somewhat heavier than the Moto G7 Power, it's just a little thinner and way newer.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit bigger screen and a way better pixel amount per display inch. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light environments, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra and Moto G7 Power count with extremely similar battery durations.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.