Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is much better than Moto G7 Power, with an 82.6 score against 72.6. Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than Moto G7 Power. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has an older 14 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto G7 Power features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy S25 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Moto G7 Power features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto G7 Power, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.