Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's global score of 72.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and incredibly thinner device than the Motorola Moto G7 Power.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a much better pixels quantity per screen inch, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Moto G7 Power counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Moto G7 Power, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a much better video quality and a much bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in Moto G7 Power.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.