Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Moto G7 Power's score of 72.6. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S5 Sport has the previous 4.4.2 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S5 Sport body is a lot lighter and a bit thinner than Moto G7 Power, even though it was released 5 years before.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel count per inch of display and a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit faster CPU than Moto G7 Power, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Moto G7 Power counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 16 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S5 Sport captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Moto G7 Power has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.