Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-07 | -- |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | -- |
| Blue | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is a a little bit thinner and lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto G7 Power. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores and a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy S6 Active also has a graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot greater pixel count per inch in the display.
Moto G7 Power counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations and a lot less MP back camera.
The Moto G7 Power features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active. Both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G7 Power features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S6 Active costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.