Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 overall score. Even though Galaxy S7 is a lot older than the Moto G7 Power, it's design is much lighter and thinner. The Galaxy S7 features a much more vibrant screen than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola Moto G7 Power has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G7 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S7 features a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S7 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures.
Moto G7 Power features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.