Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting a global score of 75.8 against 72.6. The Galaxy S7 Active construction is just a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G7 Power, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Moto G7 Power and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active have quite similar processors, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has 4 less cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Moto G7 Power features a better memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G7 Power also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power features greater battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy S7 Active has a camera that is just as good as the Motorola Moto G7 Power one, and although the Galaxy S7 Active has a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rates and a same resolution back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Moto G7 Power, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.