Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is much better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, having a general score of 81.9 against 72.6. Galaxy S8 Active is a better phone than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, we must highlight that it's also an older, just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier phone. The Galaxy S8 Active features a bit faster processor than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S8 Active also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a lot higher pixel number per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rates and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light environments and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy S8 Active features a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G7 Power has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
The Galaxy S8 Active is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.