Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 279 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Moto G7 Power, getting a general score of 81 against 72.6. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Moto G7 Power, it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a little larger screen, a greater display density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 25 megapixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 32 GB more internal memory. Moto G7 Power features superior battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Power, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.