Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer, incredibly thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Moto G7 Power.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a little bit larger screen. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G7 Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G7 Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G7 Power, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.