Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Moto G7 Power, getting a score of 85.6 against 72.6. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a a lot newer device, and it's also way thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto G7 Power.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a bit larger screen, a way higher screen pixels density and a way higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a little better performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Moto G7 Power has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Moto G7 Power counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low light situations, they both have the same resolution back facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G7 Power, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.