Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Moto G7 Power, having a overall score of 92.3 against 72.6. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is newer, just a little lighter and extremely thinner than Moto G7 Power. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a quite larger screen, a way better display density and a lot higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Moto G7 Power has a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 52% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7 Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G7 Power, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.