Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7 Power, with a 94.6 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and way thinner than the Motorola Moto G7 Power's, but it is a lot heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better looking screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a larger display, a lot higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a higher display density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a quite superior processing power than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much better photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger aperture and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G7 Power counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7 Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto G7 Power, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.