Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Moto G7 Power, getting a score of 90.6 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner than Moto G7 Power's, although it is extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has older 11 version while Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 9 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher 1768 x 2208px resolution and a higher display pixels density.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G7 Power features a little longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G7 Power shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G7 Power also has a larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.