Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than Moto G7, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 75.2. IPhone X is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the Moto G7, but Apple managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. The iPhone X counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little higher pixel quantity in each display inch.
IPhone X has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The iPhone X has a better performance than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same resolution back camera and the same aperture, the Apple iPhone X also has higher video frame rate. The Moto G7 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G7, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.