Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR is just a bit better than the Moto G7, with an 82 score against 75.2. Apple iPhone XR's body is a little thicker and heavier than Moto G7. The Apple iPhone XR features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G7, although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity in each display inch, a way lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a bit smaller display.
The Moto G7 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone XR has a better performing processor than Moto G7, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XR shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same resolution camera in the back, the Apple iPhone XR also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates. The iPhone XR features a battery lifetime that is very similar to Moto G7's battery life, although the iPhone XR has a 2% lower battery size.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G7. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Moto G7, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.