Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto G7's 75.2 general score. Google Pixel 2 XL is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Moto G7, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G7. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixel density. Google Pixel 2 XL takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Moto G7 features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL costs a little more money than the Motorola Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.