Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the Moto G7, having a general score of 78.8 against 75.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 3a construction is somewhat lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Moto G7, and both of them were only released 3 months apart.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid display than Moto G7, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto G7 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G7 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G7. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. Moto G7 and Google Pixel 3a both have similar battery durations. The Google Pixel 3a takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same camera aperture and the same video definition, the Google Pixel 3a also has a more MP camera in the back.
Although Google Pixel 3a is a better device, it costs more money than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.