Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G7, getting a global score of 78.9 against 75.2. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is just a little bit lighter but a bit thicker than Motorola Moto G7, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit superior processor than Moto G7. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3a XL has a display that's just as good as Moto G7's screen, although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a quite worse pixels amount in each inch in the screen.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a more MP back facing camera. Moto G7 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G7 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a XL costs more money than the Motorola Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.