Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Moto G7, getting an 81.9 score against 75.2. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a bit thicker but a little lighter than Moto G7, and both of them were only released 9 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 also has a camera with more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
Moto G7 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G7 features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G7, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.