Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is much better than the Moto G7's global score of 75.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone than Moto G7. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little faster processor than Moto G7, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040, a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a quite larger display. The Google Pixel 4 XL captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a back camera with a higher resolution.
Motorola Moto G7 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G7 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL features longer battery performance than Moto G7, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G7, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.