Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the Moto G7, getting an 82.9 score against 75.2. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Google Pixel 4a is a little thicker than the Moto G7, it's lighter and also newer.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto G7 has more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also has a camera in the back with more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos.
The Google Pixel 4a features just a little bit longer battery life than Moto G7, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G7, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.