Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than Moto G7, having an 89 score against 75.2. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter phone than Moto G7, but both of them are equally thin. Google Pixel 5 features a bit more powerful processor than Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better camera than Moto G7, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and better video frame rates.
Moto G7 counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 5 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G7. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G7, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.