Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a bit better than Moto G7, having a global score of 77 against 75.2. The HTC U Ultra is a just a little lighter device than Moto G7, but both of them are equally thin. HTC U Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display.
The HTC U Ultra has a processor that is very similar to the Moto G7 one, and although the HTC U Ultra has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory. The HTC U Ultra takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7. They have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera and the same camera aperture.
HTC U Ultra has a much greater memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G7 and the HTC U Ultra feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G7. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the HTC U Ultra, else you can save some money and get the Moto G7, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.