Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G7, getting a general score of 82.7 against 75.2. Even being the best in our current comparison, the LG G8X ThinQ is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Moto G7. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G7, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The LG G8X ThinQ has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG G8X ThinQ features better battery life than Moto G7, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size.
LG G8X ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the Moto G7, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.