Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto G7, getting an 82.5 score against 75.2. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is older than Moto G7, it's construction is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones use Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the older 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G7 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G7, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.